Category: Issue 504
-
New Catfish Inspection Program Complicates Pacific Trade Agreement
“A curious hurdle is threatening to complicate efforts by the United States to reach a major trade agreement with 11 Pacific nations by the end of the year: catfish,” reports New York Times writer Ron Nixon in a November 13, 2013, article describing how the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) new catfish inspection program has…
-
Center for Food Safety Asks FDA for Stronger Protections from Arsenic
In response to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s request for comments on its “Draft Guidance for Industry on Arsenic in Apple Juice: Action Level,” the Center for Food Safety (CFS) has asked the agency to “limit the public’s exposure to arsenic through a new regulatory strategy that recognizes the prevalence of arsenic in the…
-
ANZJP Article Examines Food Addiction in the Context of DSM-5
A recent viewpoint article published in the Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (ANZJP) has raised the question of whether food addiction “is a ‘true’ and valid addiction, through the lens of the recently released DSM-5,” the fifth edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Nagesh Pai, et…
-
Frito-Lay to Settle Wage-and-Hour Class Action for $1.6 Million
Subject to court approval, Frito-Lay will pay $1.6 million to settle wage-andhour claims filed on behalf of current and former employees who deliver its products to stores and arrange the store displays. Elliott v. Rolling FritoLay Sales, LP, No. 11-1730 (C.D. Cal., filed November 9, 2011). A hearing on the plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval will…
-
Putative Class Targets Whole Foods’ “All Natural” Food Labels
California residents have filed a putative class action against Whole Foods Market, alleging that the company misleads consumers by labeling certain snack products as “All Natural” because they contain “the synthetic chemical ingredient Sodium Acid Pyrophosphate, among other synthetic ingredients (e.g., Maltodextrin).” Garrison v. Whole Foods Mkt., Inc., No. 13-5222 (N.D. Cal., filed November 8,…
-
Confusion Deemed Likely in Cracker Barrel Infringement Dispute
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that a district court properly granted Kraft Foods a preliminary injunction against the sale of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store (CBOCS) food products in grocery stores under Kraft’s registered trademark name “Cracker Barrel.” Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., No. 13-2559…
-
OEHHA Proposes Listing Rapeseed Oil Emissions as Carcinogenic Under Prop. 65
California EPA’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has issued a notice of intent “to list emissions from high-temperature unrefined rapeseed oil as known to the State to cause cancer under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986” (Prop. 65). The proposal is based on the 2010 cancer identification by the…
-
OEHHA’s Carcinogen Committee to Consider Plasticizer Chemicals
California EPA’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has issued the tentative agenda for the December 5, 2013, meeting of its Carcinogen Identification Committee, which identifies chemicals for addition to the Proposition 65 list when they have been “clearly shown, through scientifically valid testing according to generally accepted principles, to cause cancer.” Under consideration…