Category: U.S. Circuit Courts
-
Federal Court Denies Request to Intervene in Nutella® Lawsuit
A federal court in New Jersey has refused the request to intervene filed by plaintiffs to a California consumer-fraud lawsuit against the company that makes the hazelnut spread Nutella®. Glover v. Ferrero USA, Inc., No. 11-1086 (D.N.J., decided October 20, 2011) (unpublished). The New Jersey action, like its California counterpart, was filed as a putative…
-
Court Trims Claims in Sugar vs. HFCS Litigation, Allows Action to Proceed
A federal court in California has issued orders allowing certain claims to proceed in Lanham Act litigation brought by sugar producers against trade associations and companies that make high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS). W. Sugar Coop. v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., No. 11-3473 (C.D. Cal., orders entered October 21, 2011). The plaintiffs allege that an advertising campaign the defendants…
-
First Circuit Denies Insurance Coverage in Deceptive Pomegranate Ad Suits Against Welch
The First Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a district court ruling that Welch Foods, Inc. was not entitled to defense costs and indemnity under an insurance contract which provided an exclusion for claims involving unfair competition and deceptive trade practices. Welch Foods, Inc. v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, No. 10-2261…
-
Eleventh Circuit Says Farmer Not Entitled to Housing Credit from H-2A Workers
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld in part a district court ruling that denied migrant workers’ claims that a Georgia onion farmer had improperly withheld the cost of housing and meals from their pay, reducing it below minimum wage. Ramos-Barrientos v. Bland, No. 10-13412 (11th Cir., decided October 27, 2011). While the appeals…
-
Overstated Protein Content Claims Settled with Free Protein Bars for Class Members
General Nutrition Centers Inc. and the company that makes 2:1 Protein Bars® have settled class claims filed in California alleging that the companies misbranded four flavors in the product line by “allegedly overstat[ing] their protein content and understat[ing] their sugar and carbohydrate content.” Cagle v. Anti-Aging Essentials, Inc., No. 11-02940 (C.D. Cal., motion for preliminary…
-
CSPI Alleges Fruit Roll-Ups® Maker Deceives Consumers
The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is representing a California woman who has sued General Mills, Inc. on behalf of a putative nationwide class of consumers who purchased the company’s Fruit Roll-Ups®, Fruit by the Foot® and Fruit Gushers® products, claiming that the company deceptively markets them as healthy and wholesome. Lam…
-
Seventh Circuit Dismisses Non-Natural Fiber Claims with Prejudice
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has dismissed with prejudice consumer protection claims filed against two companies that make snack bars with extra fiber, finding the claims preempted under federal law. Turek v. General Mills, Inc., No. 10-3267 (7th Cir., decided October 17, 2011). According to the court, “The disclaimers that the plaintiff wants added…
-
Failure-to-Warn Claims Against Tuna Co. Not Preempted, Says Federal Court
Granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss in part, a federal court in New York has allowed further proceedings on most of the claims filed by a man who alleged that consuming one to two cans of tuna daily for more than two years caused his mercury poisoning. Porrazzo v. Bumble Bee Foods, LLC, No. 10-4367…