Category: Litigation
-
Plaintiff Argues Premature Honey Harvest Reduces Antioxidants, Misleading Consumers
A consumer has filed a putative class action arguing that Dutch Gold Honey Inc. sells honey that lacks the antioxidants for which consumers purchase buckwheat honey, allegedly amounting to fraudulent misrepresentation and fraudulent concealment. Wolfe v. Dutch Gold Honey Inc., No. 19-4562 (E.D. Penn., filed October 1, 2019). “Unknown to Plaintiff and the Class, the…
-
Meatpacking Executives Plead Guilty to Selling Adulterated Beef
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced that two executives of a meatpacking plant pleaded guilty to selling 775,000 pounds of adulterated meat—”including whole cow hearts labeled as ‘ground beef’”— for more than $1 million to the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The executives’ company, West Texas Provisions, falsely marketed its products as inspected by…
-
Company Misleads on CBD Content, Consumer Alleges
A consumer has filed a putative class action alleging that the labels of Global Widget’s products containing cannabidiol (CBD), including gummies, lollipops and syrup, do not identify an accurate amount of CBD in the products. Ahumada v. Global Widget LLC, No. 12005 (D. Mass., filed September 24, 2019). “Defendant makes numerous false and misleading claims…
-
More Vanilla Challenges Filed
A plaintiff’s attorney firm has filed three putative class actions in New York federal court alleging that products marketed as “vanilla” are misleading consumers by implying that the products contain vanilla rather than vanilla flavoring. A lawsuit targeting Califia Farms’ Vanilla and Unsweetened Vanilla varieties of almondmilk asserts that the “front labels represent that the…
-
Silk Cholesterol Suit to Continue, Hit with Separate Vanilla Suit
A California federal court has refused to dismiss a lawsuit alleging that Danone US Inc. creates “a misleading impression regarding the health-promoting benefits” of its Silk Coconutmilk because it markets the product with an accurate representation of the product as free of cholesterol. Marshall v. Danone US, Inc., No. 19-1332 (N.D. Cal., entered September 13,…
-
Cannabis Edibles Co. Cannot Claim Trademark Ownership, Court Holds
A California federal court has rejected a trademark infringement claim on the grounds that the company alleging preceding use of the trademark manufactures cannabis-infused edibles, which are illegal under federal law. Kiva Health Brands LLC v. Kiva Brands Inc., No. 19-3459 (N.D. Cal., entered September 6, 2019). The parties to the litigation—Kiva Brands Inc. (KBI)…
-
StarKist to Pay $100 Million in Price-Fixing Case
A California federal court has reportedly refused to lower the fine of $100 million that StarKist must pay following a guilty plea on charges of price fixing. The company apparently argued that the penalty could bankrupt it because it continues to face potential civil damages, but the court found that StarKist had legal recourse to…
-
Ninth Circuit Sends Hemp Truck Case to State Court
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has reversed a district court’s decision not to apply an abstention that would defer a case on the legality of transporting hemp to state court proceedings. Big Sky Scientific v. Bennetts, No. 19-0040 (9th Cir., entered September 4, 2019). Hemp producers were reportedly hoping to receive…