Category: Litigation
-
Whole Foods Settles Kombucha Lawsuit
Whole Foods Market Inc. and Health-Ade LLC have agreed to pay $4 million to settle allegations that Health-Ade labels its kombucha as non-alcoholic despite containing “more alcohol than permitted for non-alcoholic beverages.” Bayol v. Health-Ade LLC, No. 18-1462 (N.D. Cal., filed March 15, 2019). Under the agreement, class members can receive $4 for each bottle…
-
Restaurant Owners Sue San Diego Over Polystyrene Ban
Three restaurant owners, along with the California Restaurant Association (CRA) and Dart Cardboard Corp. of California, have reportedly filed a lawsuit challenging San Diego’s ban on polystyrene food containers, alleging that the city failed to conduct an environmental review before instituting the ban. “The CRA has filed a legal challenge to hold city government accountable…
-
Court Dismisses Part of Malic Acid Lawsuit
A California federal court has dismissed part of a putative class action alleging Bai Brands misleads consumers as to its ingredients because it does not label “malic acid” as “d-l malic acid.” Branca v. Bai Brands, No. 18-0757 (S.D. Cal., entered March 7, 2019). The court first refused to dismiss the plaintiff’s allegation that Bai…
-
Tootsie Rolls Packaging Enjoined in Trade Dress Suit
An Ohio federal court has granted Spangler Candy Co. a preliminary injunction in its lawsuit alleging that Tootsie Roll Industries copied the packaging of its Dum Dums candy. Spangler Candy Co. v. Tootsie Roll Indus., No. 18-1146 (N.D. Ohio, entered March 13, 2019). The court found the Dum Dums red bag not inherently distinctive, instead…
-
Coconut Beverage’s “Healthy” Marketing Misleads, Consumer Alleges
A consumer has filed a putative class action alleging that The Hain Celestial Group’s Coconut Dream, “a coconut ‘milk’ style drink that is primarily coconut oil (or coconut oil and added sugar) in water,” is marketed to appeal to health-conscious consumers despite being “basically saturated fat (or saturated fat and added sugar).” Andrade-Heymsfield v. Hain…
-
Sugarfina, Sweet Pete’s Settle IP Dispute
Sugarfina and Sweet Pete’s have reached an agreement to settle allegations that Sweet Pete’s infringed Sugarfina’s trademarks, copyrights, patent and trade dress by copying the “museum-quality Lucite” used to package its candies. Sugarfina Inc. v. Sweet Pete’s, No. 17-4456 (C.D. Cal., settlement notice filed March 5, 2019). Under the agreement, Sweet Pete’s will pay $2…
-
Magnum Coffee’s “Kona” Blend Challenged
A consumer has filed a putative class action alleging that L & K Coffee Co. misleads consumers by selling a blend of coffee it labels as “Kona,” which allegedly refers to a distinctive geographic region in Hawaii. Faison v. L & K Coffee Co., No. 19-1248 (E.D.N.Y., filed March 3, 2019). The complaint asserts that…
-
Ferrara Settles SweeTart Malic Acid Litigation
A California federal court has preliminarily approved a settlement agreement between a consumer and Ferrara Candy Co. alleging the company misleadingly advertised its SweeTarts as free of artificial flavors despite containing malic acid. Littlejohn v. Ferrara Candy Co., No. 18-0658 (S.D. Cal., entered February 28, 2019). Under the agreement, Ferrara will remove the phrase “no…