Tag: artificial sweetener
-
FDA Denies Citizen Petitions Seeking Aspartame Ban
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has denied two citizen petitions asking the agency to prohibit the use of aspartame as a non-caloric sweetener. Dated July 16, 2002, the first petition argued that the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness Response Act authorizes FDA to recall dangerous chemicals without manufacturer approval. Citing studies conducted…
-
Artificial Sweeteners Allegedly Linked to Glucose Intolerance
A recent Nature study has reportedly concluded that non-caloric artificial sweeteners (NAS) elevate blood glucose levels and induce glucose intolerance by modifying gut bacteria. Jotham Suez, et al., “Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota,” Nature, September 2014. Noting that mice given drinking water prepared with either saccharin, sucralose or aspartame showed signs…
-
Court Dismisses Suit Accusing LSU of Fraudulent Sweetener Patent
A California federal court has dismissed on jurisdictional grounds Quest Nutrition LLC’s lawsuit against Louisiana State University Agricultural Center accusing the school of filing a patent for a sweetener using Quest’s confidential information. Quest Nutrition LLC v. Bd. of Supervisors of LSU Agric. & Mech. Coll., No. 14-2005 (C.D. Cal., order entered July 8, 2014). The…
-
EFSA Finds Aspartame Safe at Current Exposure Levels
The European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA’s) Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources Added to Food (ANS) has published its full risk assessment on aspartame, concluding that the food additive is safe at current levels of exposure. In addition to noting that aspartame’s breakdown products— phenylalanine, methanol and aspartic acid—occur naturally in other foods, EFSA’s…
-
FSA-Commissioned Study Examines Aspartame’s Alleged Health Effects
The U.K. Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (COT) has released a December 2013 position paper on the purported health effects of aspartame, which is currently being reviewed by the European Food Safety Authority as part of its re-evaluation of all food additives. Commissioned by the U.K. Food Standards…
-
Cargill to Settle Claims That “Natural” Ads for Truvia® Sweetener Are Misleading
While continuing to deny that its labeling and marketing for Truvia® sweetener products misled consumers, Cargill has apparently agreed to settle a putative nationwide class action alleging consumer fraud and breach of warranty. Martin v. Cargill, Inc., No. 13-2563 (D. Minn., preliminary agreement filed September 19, 2013). The plaintiffs claimed that the products are not…
-
EFSA Approves Use of Advantame Sweetener
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has concluded that the sweetener advantame is safe for human consumption. Derived from aspartame and vanillin, advantame is reportedly 37,000 times sweeter than sugar and 100 times sweeter than aspartame and can be used to enhance flavors such as fruit, citrus and mint and to extend the sweetness duration…
-
Putative Class Claims Truvia® Falsely Advertised as “Natural”
A Hawaii resident has filed a putative nationwide class action against Cargill, Inc., alleging that the company falsely advertises its Truvia® sweetener product as “natural” when it is actually made from ingredients that are “either synthetic or harshly chemically processed.” Howerton v. Cargill, Inc., No. 13-0336 (D. Haw., filed July 8, 2013). According to the…