Food & Beverage Litigation & Regulatory Update

Tag: California

  • Clif Bar & Co. to Pay $10.5 Million to Settle Sugar Class Action

    Clif Bar & Co. has submitted a settlement agreement to a California federal court seeking approval to settle a class action alleging that Clif Bars are misleadingly marketed as healthy despite containing levels of sugar beyond what consumers would expect healthy foods to contain. Milan v. Clif Bar & Co., No. 18-2354 (N.D. Cal., filed June…

  • Multiple Lawsuits Filed Against Beyond Meat for Protein Claims

    Beyond Meat Inc., producer of plant-based meat substitute products, has been hit with two lawsuits in the same week—one filed by a competitor and another filed by a group of consumers. Roberts v. Beyond Meat Inc., No. 22-2861 (N.D. Ill., E. Div., filed May 31, 2022); Don Lee Farms v. Beyond Meat Inc., No. 22-3751 (C.D.…

  • Ninth Circuit Upholds Injunction on California Acrylamide Warning

    The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has found that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting a preliminary injunction blocking a requirement to warn California consumers about the presence of acrylamide in food and beverage products. Cal. Chamber of Com. v. Council for Education and Research on Toxics, No. 19-2019 (9th Cir.,…

  • Kroger Targeted in Prop. 65 Lawsuit

    The Ecological Alliance has reportedly filed a lawsuit in California state court alleging The Kroger Co. failed to warn consumers about the presence of lead in several of its foods. Ecological Alliance LLC v. Kroger Co. (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., no. and filing date unavailable). The complaint alleges that Kroger sells fifteen products that…

  • OEHHA, FDA Issue Updates on PFAS

    Regulations governing the use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) continue to evolve. In California, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) announced the addition of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), one type of PFAS, to the list of chemicals established under the state’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Prop. 65). The…

  • Consumer Alleges “Milk-Based” Infant Formula Misleads

    A plaintiff has filed a putative class action alleging that Mead Johnson & Co. markets its Enfamil infant formula products as “milk-based” despite containing corn-syrup solids as the primary ingredient. Martinez v. Mead Johnson & Co. LLC, No. 22-0213 (C.D. Cal., E. Div., filed February 2, 2022). The front-label packaging indicates that the product is a…

  • Consumers Allege McCormick Spices Contain Undisclosed Heavy Metals

    Two plaintiffs have alleged that McCormick & Co. Inc. sells herbs and spices that “expose consumers to heightened levels of toxic heavy metals, including lead, arsenic, and cadmium,” without providing warnings. Balistreri v. McCormick & Co. Inc., No. 22-0349 (N.D. Cal., filed January 18, 2022). The complaint cites a Consumer Reports article, “Your Herbs and Spices Might Contain…

  • Consumer Alleges “Veggie” Products Lack Vegetables

    A plaintiff has filed a putative class action alleging that Kellogg Sales Co. misleads consumers as to the quantity of vegetables in its MorningStar “Veggie” products, including “Veggie Burgers,” “Veggie Dogs,” “Veggitizers” and “Veggie Chik’n.” Kennard v. Kellogg Sales Co., No. 21-7211 (N.D. Cal., filed September 17, 2021). Kellogg represents its products as “Veggie,” the…