Tag: California
-
Court Dismisses Natural Claims Against Nature’s Own® Wheat Bread
A California federal court has dismissed the claims in a putative class action alleging that Flowers Bakeries misrepresents its Nature’s Own® bread as natural, healthy and wholesome despite containing synthetic ingredients, including azodicarbonamide, the “yoga mat chemical.” Romero v. Flowers Bakeries, No. 14-5189 (N.D. Cal., San Jose Div., order entered May 6, 2015). The plaintiffs…
-
California Assembly Committee Rejects Proposed Tax on Sweetened Beverages
A proposed bill (A.B. 1357) that would have imposed a 2-cent per ounce tax on soft drinks, sweet teas, energy and sports drinks has failed to pass the California Assembly Health Committee by a vote of 10-6. “I am disappointed that the committee failed to act today on one of the biggest health crises facing…
-
Consumer Group Alleges Lead Content in T.J. Maxx Balsamic Vinegar Violates Prop. 65
Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. has filed a lawsuit against T.J. Maxx, its parent company and its food supplier alleging that they failed to provide a warning of lead content in a raspberry balsamic vinegar product in accordance with the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Prop. 65), the California law that requires…
-
Trans Fat Putative Class Actions Filed Against General Mills, Nestlé
A California man has filed purported class actions against Nestlé USA Inc. and General Mills Inc. claiming that both companies use trans fat in their products—specifically, General Mills’ baking mixes and Nestlé’s coffee creamers—despite the availability of acceptable alternative ingredients without trans fat. Backus v. Gen. Mills Inc., No. 15-1964 (N.D. Cal., filed April 30,…
-
“Nitrite in Combination with Amines or Amides” Under Consideration for Prop. 65 Listing
The California Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has asked the Carcinogen Identification Committee (CIC) to further evaluate “nitrite in combination with amines or amides” for possible inclusion on the state’s list of substances known to cause cancer under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Prop. 65).…
-
Suit Challenging Smart Balance® Cholesterol-Blocking Claims to Continue
A California federal court has denied Boulder Brands, Inc.’s motion to dismiss a lawsuit alleging that the company misrepresents the cholesterol-blocking effect of the plant sterols in its Smart Balance® butter products because the amount of plant sterols is “not enough to generate a ‘clinically meaningful cholesterol blocking effect.’” Mitchell v. Boulder Brands, Inc., No. 12-1862…
-
California Senate Health Committee Rejects SSB Warning Label Proposal
Proposed legislation (S.B. 203) that would have required all sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) containing more than 75 calories per 12-ounce serving to carry safety warnings has failed to garner the requisite five votes needed to clear the California Senate Health Committee and move forward in the legislative process. Introduced by Sen. Bill Monning (D-Carmel), the Sugar-Sweetened…
-
Hain Celestial “All Natural” Beverage Suit to Continue
A California federal court has granted in part and dismissed in part a motion to dismiss a putative consumer class action against The Hain Celestial Group alleging that the company mislabels its Sunflower Dream Drink as “all natural” despite containing artificial or synthetic ingredients, including xanthan gum and folic acid. Anderson v. The Hain Celestial Grp.,…