Tag: California
-
California Foie Gras Ban Struck Down
A California federal court has held that the state law prohibiting the sale of foie gras resulting from the forcefeeding of ducks or geese is preempted by a federal law regulating the distribution and sale of poultry products. Association des Éleveurs de Canards et d’Oies du Québec v. Harris, No. 12-5735 (C.D. Cal., order entered January…
-
Class Decertified in Blue Diamond ECJ Almond-Milk Labeling Case
A California federal court has granted Blue Diamond’s motion to decertify a statewide class of consumers who alleged that the company’s almond milk product labels were misleading because they cited “evaporated cane juice” on the ingredient list rather than the alleged common name for the substance, sugar. Werdebaugh v. Blue Diamond Growers, No. 12-2724 (N.D.…
-
Safeway Breached Contract by Adding Online-Only Markup, Says Federal Court
A California federal court has granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in a case alleging that Safeway charged a class of consumers more than the prices permitted under the terms of its online service contract when the consumers purchased groceries from the grocer’s website. Rodman v. Safeway, No. 11-3003 (order entered December 10, 2014). Safeway…
-
Maker’s Mark Bourbon Not “Handmade,” Putative Class Action Alleges
Two consumers have filed a putative class action in California federal court alleging that Maker’s Mark® bourbon whisky is not “handmade,” as the alcohol brand advertises, but is instead manufactured using “mechanized and/or automated processes” with “little to no human supervision, assistance or involvement.” Nowrouzi v. Maker’s Mark Distillery, Inc., No. 14-2885 (S.D. Cal., filed…
-
Court Refuses to Certify Class Alleging Mott’s False Advertising
A California federal court has denied certification to a putative class action alleging that Mott’s misleadingly labeled its apple juice as having “No Sugar Added” because the plaintiff failed to provide a feasible model for calculating damages. Rahman v. Mott’s LLP, No. 13-3482 (N.D. Cal., order entered December 3, 2014). The court further refused to…
-
Settlement Reached in Jamba Juice “All Natural” Smoothie Kits Class Action
After a California federal court certified the class for liability but not for damages, the parties to a class action alleging that Jamba Juice mislabeled its smoothie kits as “all natural” despite containing synthetic ingredients like gelatin and xanthan gum have reached a settlement. Lilly v. Jamba Juice Co., No. 13-2998 (U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D.…
-
Bud Light Lime-A-Ritas® Too High-Calorie to Be “Light,” Putative Class Action Says
A consumer has filed a putative class action in California state court alleging that Anheuser-Busch’s “Lime-A-Rita” malt beverages have too many calories and carbohydrates to be sold under the Bud Light Lime® label. Cruz v. Anheuser-Busch, LLC, No. BC563150 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., filed November 12, 2014). The plaintiff alleges that she purchased…
-
New Jersey Suit Joins Others Challenging “Handmade” Vodka Label
According to a news source, New Jersey residents have filed a putative class action in state court against the Texas-based company that makes Tito’s Handmade Vodka®, the fourth such action filed within the past two months, alleging that promoting and labeling the product as “handmade” deceives consumers because the vodka is made in an industrial…