Tag: candy
-
OEHHA Accepting Comments on Lead Levels in Candy
California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has announced a public hearing on a petition to issue regulations setting “naturally occurring” lead levels in candy containing chili or tamarind. The hearing, which will be webcast, is tentatively scheduled for June 19, 2017. Comments on the petition may be submitted by email or in writing…
-
Projected Class Action Claims Jelly Belly Mislabels “Sport Beans”
A California plaintiff has filed suit against the makers of Jelly Belly Sport Beans claiming the candy maker’s labeling leads consumers to believe the product does not contain sugar. Gomez v. Jelly Belly Candy Co., No. 17-0575 (C.D. Cal., filed March 24, 2017). The complaint alleges the product label says Sport Beans contain “evaporated cane…
-
Just Born Faces Second Class Action over Movie Box Candy Slack-Fill Allegations
Just Born, Inc. is facing a putative class action alleging its boxes of candy are underfilled by 35 percent. Escobar v. Just Born, Inc., No. 17-1826 (C.D. Cal., removed to federal court March 17, 2017). The plaintiff allegedly bought a box of the company’s Mike and Ike candy at a movie theater and claims Just…
-
Golden Ticket Chocolate Beer Unwraps Trademark Opposition From Willy Wonka Filmmaker
Warner Brothers, the film studio that owns the rights to the Willy Wonka movies, has asked the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to stop a Georgia craft brewer’s use of “Golden Ticket” as the name for a chocolate stout beer, claiming that the name could lead some to…
-
Putative Class Action Filed Against Ferrara Candy over Slack Fill Claims
A consumer has filed a putative class action against Ferrara Candy Co. claiming that its packaging of Jujyfruits and other candies misleads consumers by misrepresenting the amount of candy contained in each box. Iglesias v. Ferrara Candy Co., No. 17-0849 (N.D. Cal., filed February 21, 2017). The plaintiff claims that Ferrara “shortchanges consumers” by underfilling…
-
Sour Patch Slack Fill Case Dismissed
A New York federal court has dismissed a consumer’s lawsuit alleging Mondelez International sells its Sour Patch Watermelon candy with unpermitted slack fill. Izquierdo v. Mondelez Int’l Inc., No. 16-4697 (S.D.N.Y., order entered October 26, 2016). The lead plaintiff had asserted that the box he purchased contained 28 pieces of candy but had enough space for…
-
FDA Extends Vending Machine Labeling Deadlines for Certain Food Products
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has extended until July 26, 2018, the deadline for posting the calorie counts of “certain gums, mints, and roll candy products” sold in glass-front vending machines, as well as for complying with type-size front-of-pack (FOP) labeling requirements. Published December 1, 2014, and effective December 1, 2016, the final…
-
Topps Alleges “Squeezy Squirt Pop” Infringes Patent
The Topps Co. has filed a patent and trade-dress infringement lawsuit against Koko’s Confectionery & Novelty Inc. alleging that Koko’s Squeezy Squirt Pop copies some features of the Juicy Drop lollipop. Topps Co. v. Koko’s Confectionery & Novelty Inc., No. 16-0595 (S.D.N.Y., filed July 26, 2016). The complaint targets Squeezy Squirt Pop’s logo, font, bright…