Tag: labeling
-
NEJM Article Questions Usefulness of Nutrient-Content Claims
A recent perspective article in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) has questioned whether nutrient-content claims—such as “sugar-free,” “high in oat bran,” or “contains 100 calories”—are confusing to consumers. Authored by Allison Sylvetsky and William Dietz, the article claims that sugar- and calorie-related claims “may lead parents to underestimate the products’ energy content and…
-
Plaintiffs Dismiss Lawsuit Against Gruma for Alleged “All Natural” Chips Mislabeling
A California federal court has granted the plaintiffs’ request to dismiss their entire action with prejudice in a case accusing Gruma Corp. of labeling its Mission Restaurant Style tortilla chips as “all natural” despite containing genetically modified corn. Cox v. Gruma Corp., No. 12-6502 (N.D. Cal., order entered July 25, 2014). The plaintiffs’ stipulation to dismiss…
-
ECJ Misrepresentation Claims Dismissed Without Prejudice
A federal court in California has dismissed for lack of standing a putative class action alleging that Pacific Foods of Oregon, Inc. misleads consumers by using the term “evaporated cane juice” (ECJ) on its food labels instead of sugar. Swearingen v. Pac. Foods of Ore., Inc., No. 13-4157 (N.D. Cal., order entered July 30, 2014). Plaintiffs…
-
Quaker Oats Class-Action Settlement Finalized, PHOs to Be Removed
In consolidated actions pending since 2010, a federal court in California has entered a final order approving a class-action settlement that will require Quaker Oats Co. to remove partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs) from some of its oatmeal products and cease making the statement “contains a dietarily insignificant amount of trans fat” on any product label…
-
D.C. Circuit Upholds Meat-Source Labeling Requirements
In a 9-2 en banc decision, the District of Columbia Circuit has affirmed an earlier panel decision that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) can require meat producers to include country-of-origin labeling (COOL) on their packaging. Am. Meat. Inst. v. USDA, No. 13-5281 (D.C. Cir., order entered July 29, 2014). The First Amendment allows for…
-
FTC’s Four Loko Final Order Modified
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has approved a modified final order in proceedings against Phusion Projects, LLC, which markets the malt beverage Four Loko, to account for the Department of Treasury’s Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau’s (TTB’s) denial of proposed changes to the company’s product labels. In re Phusion Projects, LLC, No. C-4382…
-
Health Experts Back “Added Sugar” Labeling
The Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists has submitted a comment backed by more than 280 health experts asking the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to include a percent daily value for the proposed “added sugars” declaration on food and beverage labeling. Responding to the agency’s request for comments…
-
Putative Class Actions Accuse Whole Foods and Breyers of “All Natural” Mislabeling
According to a putative class action removed to Arkansas federal court, Whole Foods mislabels several of its 365 Everyday Value brand products as “organic” or “all natural” despite containing synthetic ingredients. Stafford v. Whole Foods Market Cal., No. 14-420 (E.D. Ark., removed July 22, 2014). Originally filed in Arkansas state court in June, the complaint accuses…