Tag: plant-based
-
Court Sides with Tofurky, Blocks Arkansas from Enforcing Meat Labeling Law
A federal court has blocked the state of Arkansas from enforcing a 2019 law that made it illegal for companies to use words like “burger” or “sausage” to describe products not made from animals. Turtle Island Foods SPC v. Soman, No. 19-0514 (E.D. Ark., entered September 30, 2022). The ruling was in a lawsuit brought…
-
“Veggie Burgers” Approved But “Vegan Cheese” Banned in EU
The European Parliament has reportedly voted against a ban on the use of meat terms for plant-based alternatives to meat, allowing words such as “burger,” “steak” and “sausage” to be used on the packaging for plant-based foods, while passing a measure to ban the use of dairy terms on alternatives to dairy foods, such as…
-
Oklahoma Plant-Based Meat Law Challenged
Upton’s Naturals Co. and the Plant Based Foods Association have filed a First Amendment challenge to Oklahoma’s law requiring manufacturers of plant-based meat products to include a disclaimer on the labels of products that are named after animal-derived products, such as “burgers.” Upton’s Naturals Co. v. Stitt, No. 20-0938 (W.D. Okla., filed September 16, 2020). The…
-
Vegan Dairy Challenges California Law on Plant-Based Food Labeling
Miyoko’s Kitchen Inc. has filed a lawsuit asserting that California infringed its First Amendment right to free speech by requiring the removal of “truthful messages and images from its website and its product labels—including the phrase ‘100% cruelty and animal free,’ the use of the word ‘butter’ in the phrase ‘vegan plant butter,’ and even…
-
Tofurky Granted Preliminary Injunction on Arkansas Meat-Labeling Law
An Arkansas federal court has granted Turtle Island Foods SPC, which does business as Tofurky Co., a preliminary injunction preventing the enforcement against it of an Arkansas law prohibiting the use of meat-related terms to describe plant-based products on food packaging. Turtle Island Foods SPC v. Soman, No. 19-0514 (E.D. Ark., C. Div., entered December…
-
Bipartisan “Real MEAT Act” Would Define “Beef” Federally
Reps. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) and Anthony Brindisi (D-N.Y.) have introduced the Real Marketing Edible Artificials Truthfully (MEAT) Act, which would “codify the definition of beef for labeling purposes, reinforce existing misbranding provisions to eliminate consumer confusion, and enhance enforcement measures available to the [U.S. Department of Agriculture] if the [Food and Drug Administration] fails to…
-
CFS Urges FDA to Have Impossible Burgers Pulled from Grocery Stores
The Center for Food Safety (CFS) has submitted a letter to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) Office of Food Additive Safety arguing that the sale of “uncooked Impossible Burgers to consumers in grocery stores” is unlawful because FDA “received timely objections to the agency’s approval of Impossible Foods’ color additive petition.” CFS argues…
-
UK House of Lords Subcommittee Argues Against Meat Definition Laws
The EU Energy and Environment Subcommittee of the U.K. House of Lords has submitted a letter to the country’s agriculture minister in response to a EU committee’s approval of a measure that would prohibit the use of meat-associated words and phrases—including “sausage,” “burger” and “steak”—to describe plant-derived products. “Veggie tubes proposal a misteak,” the subcommittee’s…