
Keeping the food, beverage and agriculture industry up-to-date for more than 20 years.
Food & Beverage Litigation & Regulatory Update
Categories
- 10th Circuit
- 11th Circuit
- 1st Circuit
- 2nd Circuit
- 3rd Circuit
- 4th Circuit
- 5th Circuit
- 6th Circuit
- 7th Circuit
- 8th Circuit
- 9th Circuit
- Advertising Standards Authority
- Canada
- Canadian Courts
- Conferences & Seminars
- D.C. Circuit
- Department of Agriculture
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Justice
- Department of the Treasury
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Europe
- European Courts
- European Food Safety Authority
- FDA
- Federal Circuit
- Federal Trade Commission
- Firm News
- Global
- Global Courts
- Issue
- Issue 460
- Issue 485
- Issue 487
- Issue 633
- Issue 635
- Issue 636
- Issue 637
- Issue 638
- Issue 639
- Issue 640
- Issue 641
- Issue 642
- Issue 643
- Issue 644
- Issue 645
- Issue 646
- Issue 647
- Issue 648
- Issue 649
- Issue 650
- Issue 651
- Issue 652
- Issue 653
- Issue 654
- Issue 655
- Issue 656
- Issue 657
- Issue 658
- Issue 659
- Issue 660
- Issue 661
- Issue 662
- Issue 663
- Issue 664
- Issue 665
- Issue 666
- Issue 667
- Issue 668
- Issue 669
- Issue 670
- Issue 671
- Issue 672
- Issue 673
- Issue 674
- Issue 675
- Issue 676
- Issue 677
- Issue 678
- Issue 679
- Issue 680
- Issue 681
- Issue 682
- Issue 683
- Issue 684
- Issue 685
- Issue 686
- Issue 687
- Issue 688
- Issue 689
- Issue 690
- Issue 691
- Issue 692
- Issue 693
- Issue 694
- Issue 695
- Issue 696
- Issue 697
- Issue 698
- Issue 699
- Issue 700
- Issue 701
- Issue 702
- Issue 703
- Issue 704
- Issue 705
- Issue 706
- Issue 707
- Issue 708
- Issue 709
- Issue 710
- Issue 711
- Issue 712
- Issue 713
- Issue 714
- Issue 715
- Issue 716
- Issue 717
- Issue 718
- Issue 719
- Issue 720
- Issue 721
- Issue 722
- Issue 723
- Issue 724
- Issue 725
- Issue 726
- Issue 727
- Issue 728
- Issue 729
- Issue 730
- Issue 731
- Issue 732
- Issue 733
- Issue 734
- Issue 735
- Issue 736
- Issue 737
- Issue 738
- Issue 739
- Issue 740
- Issue 741
- Issue 742
- Issue 743
- Issue 744
- Issue 745
- Issue 746
- Issue 747
- Issue 748
- Issue 749
- Issue 750
- Issue 751
- Issue 752
- Issue 753
- Issue 754
- Issue 755
- Issue 756
- Issue 757
- Issue 757
- Issue 758
- Issue 759
- Issue 760
- Issue 761
- Issue 762
- Issue 763
- Issue 764
- Issue 765
- Issue 766
- Issue 767
- Issue 768
- Issue 769
- Issue 770
- Issue 771
- Issue 772
- Issue 773
- Issue 774
- Issue 775
- Issue 776
- Issue 777
- Issue 778
- Issue 779
- Issue 780
- Issue 781
- Issue 782
- Issue 783
- Issue 784
- Issue 785
- Issue 786
- Legislation, Regulations and Standards
- Litigation
- Media Coverage
- National Advertising Division
- National Labor Relations Board
- Other Developments
- Patent and Trademark Office
- Scientific/Technical Items
- Special Supplement 2017
- Spotlight
- State Courts
- Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
- U.S. Circuit Courts
- U.S. Government and Regulatory Agencies
- U.S. Supreme Court
- UK Food Standards Authority
- Uncategorized
- World Trade Organization
- Year in Review 2019
Tags


-
Malic Acid Suit Filed Against True Lemon
Grand Brands Inc. allegedly markets its True Lemon powdered drink mixes as “naturally flavored” despite containing malic acid, a plaintiff alleges. Tedesco v. Grand Brands Inc., No. 20-1928 (S.D. Cal., filed September 28, 2020). The complaint asserts that Grand Brands fails to identify the type of malic acid included in its products and alleges that…
-
FDA Finds Milk Allergens in Dark Chocolate Samples
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced the results of a study examining 52 dark chocolate products, determining that four of the products had potentially hazardous levels of milk allergens. “The agency found the 12 samples from the four products to have milk allergen levels ranging from 600 ppm to 3,100 ppm,” the…
-
USDA Denies Veal Group’s Petition on Regulatory Definitions
The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), a part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), has responded to a petition submitted by the American Veal Association aiming to establish “a regulatory definition for veal and other immature cattle that reflects established industry practices.” The petition included a proposed definition and suggested subcategories for “milk-fed…
-
FDA to Hold Meetings on Proposed Traceability Records Requirements
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration will host three virtual public meetings to discuss the proposal of additional traceability records required for high-risk foods. All three meetings “will cover the same agenda items and are intended to facilitate and support the public’s evaluation and commenting process.” The meetings will be held November 6, November 18…
-
APHIS to Amend National Poultry Improvement Plan
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has announced that it will amend regulations governing the National Poultry Improvement Plan (NPIP). The amendments “establish a U.S. Newcastle Disease Clean program within the NPIP, create an NPIP subpart specific to game birds, revise testing requirements, and clarify existing provisions of the…
-
FDA Accepting Comments on Cultured Seafood Labeling
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has requested information “pertaining to the labeling of foods comprised of or containing cultured seafood cells,” which the agency notes are “being developed and may soon enter the marketplace.” “Animal cell culture technology involves the controlled growth of animal cells, their subsequent differentiation into various cell types, and…
-
Hemp Trade Association Challenges DEA Cannabis Rule
The Hemp Industries Association and RE Botanicals Inc. have filed a lawsuit challenging the Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA’s) interim final rule implementing changes to the scope of the agency’s control over cannabis and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Hemp Industry Ass’n v. DEA, No. __ (D.C. Cir., filed September 18, 2020). “The DEA’s interim final rule clarifies that…
-
Arizona “Zero-Calorie” Beverage Contains Calories, Plaintiff Alleges
A consumer has alleged in a putative class action that the “zero-calorie” version of Arizona Beverages USA’s Arnold Palmer actually contained 15 calories per can. Meyers v. Arizona Beverages USA LLC, No. 20-5543 (N.D. Ill., E. Div., filed September 18, 2020). The complaint asserts that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration required Arizona Beverages to change…
Questions for our authors?