
Keeping the food, beverage and agriculture industry up-to-date for more than 20 years.
Food & Beverage Litigation & Regulatory Update
Categories
- 10th Circuit
- 11th Circuit
- 1st Circuit
- 2nd Circuit
- 3rd Circuit
- 4th Circuit
- 5th Circuit
- 6th Circuit
- 7th Circuit
- 8th Circuit
- 9th Circuit
- Advertising Standards Authority
- Canada
- Canadian Courts
- Conferences & Seminars
- D.C. Circuit
- Department of Agriculture
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Justice
- Department of the Treasury
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Europe
- European Courts
- European Food Safety Authority
- FDA
- Federal Circuit
- Federal Trade Commission
- Firm News
- Global
- Global Courts
- Issue
- Issue 460
- Issue 485
- Issue 487
- Issue 633
- Issue 635
- Issue 636
- Issue 637
- Issue 638
- Issue 639
- Issue 640
- Issue 641
- Issue 642
- Issue 643
- Issue 644
- Issue 645
- Issue 646
- Issue 647
- Issue 648
- Issue 649
- Issue 650
- Issue 651
- Issue 652
- Issue 653
- Issue 654
- Issue 655
- Issue 656
- Issue 657
- Issue 658
- Issue 659
- Issue 660
- Issue 661
- Issue 662
- Issue 663
- Issue 664
- Issue 665
- Issue 666
- Issue 667
- Issue 668
- Issue 669
- Issue 670
- Issue 671
- Issue 672
- Issue 673
- Issue 674
- Issue 675
- Issue 676
- Issue 677
- Issue 678
- Issue 679
- Issue 680
- Issue 681
- Issue 682
- Issue 683
- Issue 684
- Issue 685
- Issue 686
- Issue 687
- Issue 688
- Issue 689
- Issue 690
- Issue 691
- Issue 692
- Issue 693
- Issue 694
- Issue 695
- Issue 696
- Issue 697
- Issue 698
- Issue 699
- Issue 700
- Issue 701
- Issue 702
- Issue 703
- Issue 704
- Issue 705
- Issue 706
- Issue 707
- Issue 708
- Issue 709
- Issue 710
- Issue 711
- Issue 712
- Issue 713
- Issue 714
- Issue 715
- Issue 716
- Issue 717
- Issue 718
- Issue 719
- Issue 720
- Issue 721
- Issue 722
- Issue 723
- Issue 724
- Issue 725
- Issue 726
- Issue 727
- Issue 728
- Issue 729
- Issue 730
- Issue 731
- Issue 732
- Issue 733
- Issue 734
- Issue 735
- Issue 736
- Issue 737
- Issue 738
- Issue 739
- Issue 740
- Issue 741
- Issue 742
- Issue 743
- Issue 744
- Issue 745
- Issue 746
- Issue 747
- Issue 748
- Issue 749
- Issue 750
- Issue 751
- Issue 752
- Issue 753
- Issue 754
- Issue 755
- Issue 756
- Issue 757
- Issue 757
- Issue 758
- Issue 759
- Issue 760
- Issue 761
- Issue 762
- Issue 763
- Issue 764
- Issue 765
- Issue 766
- Issue 767
- Issue 768
- Issue 769
- Issue 770
- Issue 771
- Issue 772
- Issue 773
- Issue 774
- Issue 775
- Issue 776
- Issue 777
- Issue 778
- Issue 779
- Issue 780
- Issue 781
- Issue 782
- Issue 783
- Issue 784
- Issue 785
- Issue 786
- Legislation, Regulations and Standards
- Litigation
- Media Coverage
- National Advertising Division
- National Labor Relations Board
- Other Developments
- Patent and Trademark Office
- Scientific/Technical Items
- Special Supplement 2017
- Spotlight
- State Courts
- Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
- U.S. Circuit Courts
- U.S. Government and Regulatory Agencies
- U.S. Supreme Court
- UK Food Standards Authority
- Uncategorized
- World Trade Organization
- Year in Review 2019


-
Mashed Potatoes Lawsuit Dismissed
A New York federal court has dismissed a lawsuit alleging that BEF Foods Inc. misleadingly marketed its Bob Evans mashed potatoes as containing butter. Sarr v. BEF Foods, No. 18-6409 (E.D.N.Y., entered February 13, 2020). The lawsuit alleged that the packaging promised “real butter” and “fresh potatoes” despite containing vegetable oil and preservatives. The court…
-
Honey Purchasers Granted Certification
A California federal court has granted certification to a class of consumers who purchased honey from one of the brands produced by the Sioux Honey Association who believed the honey to be “pure” or “100% pure. Tran v. Sioux Honey Ass’n, No. 17-0110 (C.D. Cal., entered February 24, 2020). The plaintiff asserts that the honey…
-
LaCroix Linalool Lawsuit Dropped
A lawsuit challenging the ingredients in LaCroix sparkling water has been dismissed with prejudice by the plaintiffs. Rice v. Nat’l Beverage Corp., No. 18-7151 (N.D. Ill., E. Div., entered February 18, 2020). National Beverage Corp. reportedly shared a letter with the media about the voluntary dismissal, stating that a laboratory cited in the complaint confirmed…
-
Kellogg “Healthy” Settlement Rejected
A California federal court has rejected a settlement in a lawsuit that alleged Kellogg Sales Co. misled consumers by marketing its products as “healthy.” Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co., No. 16-4955 (N.D. Cal., San Jose Div., entered February 20, 2020). The court found the settlement agreement to be invalid for several reasons: (i) “the release…
-
Jägermeister Logo Permissible Despite Religious Symbol, Swiss Court Rules
The Swiss Federal Administrative Court has reportedly ruled that Jägermeister can use its logo, “a stag with a shining white cross between its antlers,” on a variety of products in Switzerland because it is not offensive to religion. The Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property had argued for a restriction on the use of the…
-
FDA Releases Guidance on Intentional Adulteration
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has released the third and final installment of its draft guidance on intentional adulteration of food under the Food Safety Modernization Act. The guidance focuses on food defense corrective actions, food defense verification, reanalysis and recordkeeping. The rule applies to domestic and foreign companies required to register with…
-
Vegan Dairy Challenges California Law on Plant-Based Food Labeling
Miyoko’s Kitchen Inc. has filed a lawsuit asserting that California infringed its First Amendment right to free speech by requiring the removal of “truthful messages and images from its website and its product labels—including the phrase ‘100% cruelty and animal free,’ the use of the word ‘butter’ in the phrase ‘vegan plant butter,’ and even…
-
“No Sugar Added” Implies Nothing About Competitors, Court Rules
A California appeals court has determined that the “no sugar added” phrasing on Califia Farms’ Cuties tangerine juice does not imply to consumers that competitors add sugar to their products. Shaeffer v. Califia Farms LLC, No. B291085 (Cal. App. Ct., entered February 6, 2020). The lower court dismissed the complaint, ruling that the “no sugar…
Questions for our authors?